I saw the movie “Moneyball” starring Brad Pitt (http://www.moneyball-movie.com/), within the first fifteen minutes I was seeing significant parallels between that story and the story of business management/business planning.
Early on in the movie, a group of scouts and managers for the Oakland A’s baseball team are sitting around a conference table trying to figure out how they can replace key players they lost because they could no longer afford them given the team’s budget constraints (budget constraints sound familiar?). The loss of these players left a huge hole in the A’s program. As you might expect, the meeting was a lot of “shoot from the hip” characterizations of existing players based on assumptions as varied as what the player’s wife looked like or what car they drive. In this meeting Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) and Peter Brand (Jonah Hill) suggest that the past just doesn’t matter, the only thing that truly matters is “on base percentage”. Their thinking was if they could get players on base, they will win. They proceeded to identify those undervalued players with the highest “on base percentage”.
Bingo! This line of thinking made me think of the Balanced Scorecard Methodology and the passionate belief in certain key metrics driving the business. To Jonah Hill’s character, it is all about getting on base, any way you can, it is about on base percentage (Key Metric). To Brad Pitt’s character, only one game mattered, winning the last game of the season…the World Series game (goal).
During the movie:
Other observations that parallel business:
My main take away from the movie (as a declaimer, if it’s not obvious, I’m an analyst at heart) is let’s learn from the innovative leadership of this legendary A’s team, if better metrics-driven management with proper coaching of those metrics can have a positive impact on a baseball team — where individual split-second performance at the plate and in the field is what matters and we use averages to explain it — there’s no reason the same positive outcome shouldn’t come from better metrics-driven management and fact-based decisions in the business as well.
Speaking of major league baseball, huge congratulations to the 2011 World Champs, the St. Louis Cardinals!
Last week, we discussed financial planning and how it fits into the overall framework of integrated business planning. This week’s post focuses on project planning. Let’s first take a look at the three functions of managing a business: Running the day to day operations of the business; Transforming the business based on to the new demands of customers and changes in the economy; Growing the business; project planning focuses on the Transforming and Growing aspects of a business. Project planning monetizes the cost and benefits of Capital Expenditures (CapEx), and Strategic Expenditures (Stratex). Its objective is the efficient allocation of capital and resources to maximize shareholder/owner value consistent with the strategic plan. To achieve this objective, project plans need to be considered as separate entities with separate Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Cash Flow.
Project Planning
The diagram below shows the relationship between project planning and the financial and operational plans as well as scenario management using an Excel metaphor.
In the diagram above, project planning is shown in the center cylinder labeled “Capex and Stratex Projects.” Each spreadsheet in the center cylinder represents a separate project, with complete Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Cash Flow. Collectively the cylinder represents the complete portfolio of projects across the entire organization and divides the projects up into three categories:
The key thought being conveyed in the diagram is each project plan needs to be treated as an independent entity that impacts both operational and financial plans. The system must have the flexibility to move these projects in and out of different forecasts and “what-if” scenarios to measure the impact on required funding, operations and financial results.
Transparency and Flexibility
The combination of driver based planning, discussed in the previous two blog posts, along with project based planning and the ability to move projects in and out of a plan provide the “levers” integrated business planning requires creating a dynamic planning environment.
For a more detailed look at the templates and models behind project planning check out the white paper “Achieving superior financial flexibility through project budgeting and planning”.
The models above fit in the overall IBP framework of the post on July 25, 2011 (click here to review) as shown in the diagram below:
Project planning is typically an ongoing process. Initial projects may start with a “back of envelope” calculation and are refined and “tightened” as their feasibility and probability of execution become more certain. As mentioned above, project planning requires the ability manage a portfolio of potential projects and move them in and out of the plan depending on economic conditions, market conditions, competitor actions and the company’s strategic plan. Next week’s blog will focus on the strategic planning process and how it drives both Stratex projects as well as the financial and operational plan.
I’ve received a number of emails from my May 31, 2011 post requesting an example of what “In Context” information would look like. I’ve prepared a brief video showing some software by MarketSmith for investment information that provides an excellent example of an “In Context” interface. Please use this link to watch the video.
Just this past weekend I was at one of my oldest daughter’s softball tournaments. In a tight game, a key hitter for her team was asked to bunt rather than hit. The bunt resulted in moving the runners on base into scoring position which in turn resulted in runs when the following batter got a base hit. This is a common scenario in baseball/softball and other team sports where individual performers are asked to selflessly perform for the greater good of the team. It is the job of the coach to assess all the facts, quickly, and determine the right strategy and then it is back to the individual to execute on the strategy.
The same can be said for business. Many times individual people or business units are asked to do things for the greater good of the entire company. Like coaches, it’s up to management teams to assess the facts, quickly, and determine the right strategy. The difference is that unlike coaches who are right there on the field and can easily see most of the factors at play, management teams have to depend on information that might be coming from different geographies, different business types and, of course, from people who may have different interpretations.
That is why management teams need solutions that can help them gather and more importantly rationalize the facts in a quick and timely manner. If they can’t get all the facts quickly and in a format that makes sense, how can they be expected to pull together a winning strategy? It would be like a coach being asked to call the next play after it already happened.
Download a free demo and learn how Host Analytics can help your organization with your budgeting and forecasting solutions.
Sadly, most definitions miss the point. The term “Scorecards” originated with the Kaplan and Norton’s definition of the balanced scorecard and was meant to create a strategic method of management. Scorecard software, for its part, is intended to encapsulate a company’s strategic plan and allow operations to be measured against it.
In this way, the scorecard considers information not from the bottom up, with an “in all this data there must be a pony some where” perspective, but from the top down. In other words, What is strategic to our business and can we measure it from the highest levels through the lowest levels of detail to support decisions and action plans? The author of the Performance Point Server book treated scoring and weighting as an optional activity. Of course, scoring and weighting is the only way to effectively measure what seem to be obtuse strategic objectives. more…